A Selected Bibliography by Bryan Midgley

A
Kantor at Cheiron Society meeting,
Kantor at Cheiron Society meeting, 1973; from L to R: Sam Campbell, Marion McPherson, unknown, Jerry Carter, Parker Lichtenstein, Kantor, Paul Mountjoy, Irv Wolf, unknown, Arthur Kahn, and Noel Smith (photo courtesy of N. W. Smith
This is a personal and in-progress list of secondary sources on or related to Kantor and interbehaviorism.

Bentley, A. F. (1935). The apprehensional space-segment: Kantor. In Behavior Knowledge Fact (pp. 89-99). Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.

Bueno, R. (1993). El conductismo a los ochenta: Un análisis tridimensional. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 19, 97-119.

Cone, D. M. (1987). Understanding human behavior: A review of Reese and Parrott’s Behavior Science. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 287-288.

Delprato, D. J. (1979). The interbehavioral alternative to brain-dogma. The Psychological Record, 29, 409-418.

Delprato, D. J. (1986). Response patterns. In H. W. Reese & L. J. Parrott (Eds.), Behavior science: Philosophical, methodological, and empirical advances (pp. 61-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Delprato, D. J. (1987). Developmental interactionism: An integrative framework for behavior therapy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 173-205.

Fuller, P. R. (1973). Professors Kantor and Skinner–the “grand alliance” of the 40’s. The Psychological Record, 23, 318-324.

Hayes, L. J. (1992). The psychological present. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 139-145.

Hayes, L. J. (1994). Thinking. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 149-164). Reno, NV: Context Press.

Hayes, L. J., Ribes, E., & Lopez, F. (Eds). (1994). Psicología interconductual: Contribuciones en honor a J. R. Kantor. Guadalajara, México: Universidad de Guadalajara.

Hearst, E., & Capshew, J. H. (Eds.). (1988). Psychology at Indiana University: A centennial review and compendium. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Department of Psychology. Note: see pages 38-39, 42.

Lichtenstein, P. E. (1959). Perspectives in psychology X. Perception and the psychological metasystem. The Psychological Record, 9, 37-44.

Lichtenstein, P. E. (1988). Interbehavioral psychology and Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 11, 53-61.

Marr, M. J. (1984). Some reflections on Kantor’s (1970) “an analysis of the experimental analysis of behavior (TEAB).” The Behavior Analyst, 7, 189-196.

Moore, J. (1984). Conceptual contributions of Kantor’s interbehavioral psychology. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 183-187.

Morris, E. K. (1982). Some relationships between interbehavioral psychology and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 10, 187-216.

Morris, E. K. (1984). Interbehavioral psychology and radical behaviorism: Some similarities and differences. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 197-204.

Morris, E. K., Higgins, S. T., & Bickel, W. K. (1982). The influence of Kantor’s interbehavioral psychology on behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 158-173.

Mountjoy, P. T. (1976). Science in psychology: J. R. Kantor’s field theory. Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta, 2, 3-21.

Mountjoy, P. T., & Hansor, J. D. (1986). Jacob Robert Kantor (1888-1984). American Psychologist, 41, 1296-1297.

Mountjoy, P. T., & Ruben, D. H. (1984). Extinction and resurgence of scientific history: An interbehavioral analysis. The Psychological Record, 34, 553-566.

Parrott, L. J. (1983). On the differences between Skinner’s radical behaviorism and Kantor’s interbehaviorism. Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta, 9, 95-115.

Parrott, L. J. (1984). J. R. Kantor’s contributions to psychology and philosophy: A guide to further study. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 169-181.

Parrott, L. J. (1984). Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 29-39.

Parrott, L. J. (1986). The role of postulation in the analysis of inapparent events. In H. W. Reese & L. J. Parrott (Eds.), Behavior science: Philosophical, methodological, and empirical advances (pp. 35-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pronko, N. H. (1973). Panorama of psychology (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Pronko, N. H. (1980). Psychology from the standpoint of an interbehaviorist. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Pronko, N. H. (1988). From AI to zeitgeist: A philosophical guide for the skeptical psychologist. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Pronko, N. H., & Bowles, J. W., Jr. (1951). Empirical foundations of psychology. New York: Rinehart.

Pronko, N. H., & Herman, D. T. (1982). From Dewey’s reflex arc concept to transactionalism and beyond. Behaviorism, 10, 229-254.

Ray, R. D. (1977). Psychology experiments as interbehavioral systems: A case study from the Soviet Union. The Psychological Record, 27,279-306.

Ray, R. D., & Brown, D. A. (1975). A systems approach to behavior. The Psychological Record, 25, 459-478.

Ray, R. D., & Brown, D. A. (1976). The behavioral specificity of stimulation: A systems approach to procedural distinctions of classical and instrumental conditioning. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences, 11, 3-23. 

Ray, R. D., Upson, J. D., & Henderson, B. J. (1977). A systems approach to behavior III: Organismic pace and complexity in time-space fields.The Psychological Record, 27, 649-682.

Ray, R. D., Upson, J. D., & Henderson, B. J. (1978). The structural-functional analysis of interbehavioral systems. In G. J. Klir (Ed.), Applied general systems research: Recent developments and trends (pp. 589-600). New York: Plenum.

Ribes Inesta, E. (1987). Some thoughts on thinking and its motivation. Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta, 13, 317-335.

Robinson, E. S. (1924-1925). [Review of the book Principles of psychology by J. R. Kantor.] International Journal of Ethics, 35, 432-435.

Ruben, D. H. (1984). Major trends in interbehavioral psychology from articles published in The Psychological Record (1937-1983). The Psychological Record, 34, 589-617.

Ruben, D. H. (1986). The “interbehavioral” approach to treatment. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 16, 62-71.

Ruben, D. H., & Delprato, D. J. (Eds.). (1987). New ideas in therapy: Introduction to an interdisciplinary approach. Westport, CT: Greenwood. (Spanish chapter by Kantor)

Schoenfeld, W. N. (1969).  J. R. Kantor’s Objective psychology of grammar and Psychology and logic: A retrospective appreciation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 329-347.

Schoenfeld, W. N. (1983). The contemporary state of behavior theory. Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta, 9, 55-82. 

Smith, N. W. (1973). Interbehavioral psychology: Roots and branches. The Psychological Record, 23, 153-167.

Smith, N. W. (1976). The works of J. R. Kantor: Pioneer in scientific psychology. Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta, 2, 137-148.

Smith, N. W. (1984). Fundamentals of interbehavioral psychology. The Psychological Record, 34, 479-494. 

Smith, N. W. (1993). Greek and interbehavioral psychology (Rev. ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Smith, N. W., Mountjoy, P. T., & Ruben, D. H. (Eds.). (1983). Reassessment in psychology: The interbehavioral alternative. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Stephenson, W. (1982). Q-methodology, interbehavioral psychology, and quantum theory. The Psychological Record, 32, 235-248.

Upson, J. D., & Ray, R. D. (1984). An interbehavioral systems model for empirical investigation in psychology. The Psychological Record, 34,497-524.

 Verplanck, W. S. (1996). From 1924 to 1996, and into the future: Operation analytic behaviorism. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 22, 19-60.

Categories

Interbehavioral in Spotify

Spotify Logo Listen on Spotify

Newsletter

Kantor’s Twitter

Scientific situations as much as any other display evaluations and values. Evaluations pertain to events investigated, to methods used, and the interpretations of results obtained.

Similar deterioration of institutions occur in the changed functioning of political processes; so that they are no longer reacted to as genuine administrative agencies but rather as exploitative activities of office-holding and the maladministration of public funds.

In philosophical situations cultural reactions and valuations may center around problems of ontology or epistemology. Students become ingrained with attitudes such as realism, idealism, pragmatism, phenomenology, or linguistic analysis.

Keywords